Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Filip Misolic vs Matteo Martineau Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Misolic vs Martineau analysis and find out who is favored!
Filip Misolic vs Matteo Martineau Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Misolic 0 - 0 Martineau
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Misolic has won 48.74% of points on his second serve, while Martineau has won 50.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Misolic, in recent form, has won 47.18% of his opponent's second serve points, while Martineau has won 48.84%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.77% and 30.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Misolic has saved 61.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Martineau has saved 62.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Misolic has won 50% of matches played (W/L 26/ 26), with Martineau winning 59.09% (W/L 52/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Misolic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 123/ 60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Martineau has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 52/ 33), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Misolic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.83% of matches (W/L 13/ 16), where as Martineau has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.61% of matches (W/L 40/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Misolic has played against opponents with an average rank of 239.81 while Martineau has played against players with an average rank of 268.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Misolic has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Martineau has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Misolic has converted 42.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Martineau has converted 42.13% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Misolic 0 - 0 Martineau
201
Rank
126
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
183
Rank
183
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
62% (149-92)
Career Total W/L
56% (271-215)
33% (6-12)
YTD W/L
56% (19-15)
$233,040
Career Prize Money
$32,325
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Filip Misolic | Matteo Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (6/12) | 56% (19/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (16/26) | 55% (46/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (199/218) | 51% (416/394) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) | 47% (7/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (12/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 73 | 213 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 78 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:31 | 1:44:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 253.94 | 288.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (748/1342) | 69% (1668/2406) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (537/748) | 72% (1193/1668) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (285/594) | 50% (368/738) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (45/100) | 40% (87/218) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (464/1288) | 37% (927/2519) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (6/10) | 61% (19/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (6/18) | 56% (19/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | 50% (7/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 47% (7/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 56% (9/5) | 88% (17/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 44% (9/4) | 12% (17/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 24% (17/4) |
Filip Misolic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Filip Misolic
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Filip Misolic
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
47%
(
41 of
87)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Ugo Blanchet
39%
(
35 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
47%
(
26 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
41%
(
32 of
79)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
5
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Pouille
Player
Filip Misolic
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Filip Misolic
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Michael Geerts
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
37 of
44)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Billy Harris
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Filip Misolic
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Martineau Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Matteo Martineau
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Henri Squire
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Matteo Martineau
37%
(
33 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
4
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
52%
(
29 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Matteo Martineau
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Matteo Martineau
80%
(
73 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Miedler
Player
Matteo Martineau
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Matteo Martineau
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Misolic Vs Martineau Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
